1.3: Rank Structure

Management versus Leadership

Many people use the term leadership interchangeably with management, but the two terms are actually quite different. The term management implies someone has been given a position, and through that position or title, they have the power to guide others. Leadership, on the other hand, does not require specific titles. Consider the last group project you worked on for school. It was likely that someone took on the leadership role for this project, such as coordinating schedules, emailing the team, and so forth. This person did not have a formal title but led the group anyway. This is an example of leadership. To be successful at our jobs, we must show leadership skills. These leadership skills can come from our emotional intelligence skills—for example, self-awareness, self-management, relationship management, and social awareness. All emotional intelligence skills are needed to be a successful leader. For example, if you are the informal leader for your group project and feel frustrated with response times, you must have the ability to be aware of this emotion and manage it by not yelling at your team member when you see them!

Getting the team to work better together requires social awareness skills, or the ability to understand how actions of one team member may affect another. Finally, relationship management is necessary to manage group conflict and maintain good relationships with your team. As you can see, leadership encompasses all of the emotional intelligence skills we have been discussing throughout the book. Do you think leadership comes naturally to some and not to others?

Whether or not there is a “natural leader,” born with a combination of talents and traits that enable a person to lead others, has been a subject of debate across time. In a modern context, we have come to recognize that leadership comes in many forms and representations. Once it was thought that someone with presence of mind, innate intelligence, and an engaging personality was destined for leadership, but modern research and experience show us otherwise. Just as a successful heart surgeon has a series of skill sets, so does a dynamic leader. A television producer must both direct and provide space for talent to create, balancing control with confidence and trust. This awareness of various leadership styles serves our discussion as groups and teams often have leaders, and they may not always be the person who holds the title, status, or role.

Leaders take on the role because they are appointed, elected, or emerge into the role. The group members play an important role in this process. An appointed leader is designated by an authority to serve in that capacity, irrespective of the thoughts or wishes of the group. They may serve as the leader and accomplish all the designated tasks, but if the group does not accept their role as leader, it can prove to be a challenge. As Bruce Tuckman (1965) notes, “storming” occurs as group members come to know each other and communicate more freely, and an appointed leader who lacks the endorsement of the group may experience challenges to his or her authority.

A democratic leader is elected or chosen by the group but may also face serious challenges. If individual group members or constituent groups feel neglected or ignored, they may assert that the democratic leader does not represent their interests. The democratic leader involves the group in the decision-making process and ensures group ownership of the resulting decisions and actions as a result. Open and free discussions are representative of this process, and the democratic leader acknowledges this diversity of opinion.

An emergent leader contrasts the first two paths to the role by growing into the role, often out of necessity. The appointed leader may know little about the topic or content, and group members will naturally look to the senior member with the most experience for leadership. If the democratic leader fails to bring the group together or does not represent the whole group, subgroups may form, each with an informal leader serving as spokesperson.³

Chain of Command

Correctional facilities rely on a structured chain of command to maintain safety, security, and effective daily operations. Each leadership position, from front-line supervisors to executive administrators, plays a distinct role in overseeing staff, managing inmate populations, and enforcing institutional policies. Understanding the responsibilities of correctional sergeants, lieutenants, captains, deputy wardens, and wardens provides insight into how authority and accountability are distributed within a correctional setting to ensure order and compliance.

Correctional Sergeants are first-line supervisors who directly oversee correctional officers and inmate housing units or work areas. They ensure officers are performing duties properly, enforce institutional rules and procedures, conduct security checks, and respond to incidents such as disturbances or emergencies. Sergeants also handle routine reports, provide guidance and training to staff, and act as the primary link between line officers and higher-ranking supervisors.

Correctional Lieutenants supervise multiple sergeants and are responsible for managing entire shifts or major sections of the facility. They coordinate daily operations, assign staff posts, review reports, and ensure policies and safety procedures are consistently followed. Lieutenants often lead investigations into incidents, handle disciplinary matters, and make critical decisions during emergencies, serving as a key operational leader within the chain of command.

Correctional Captains oversee broad areas of facility operations, such as housing units, security divisions, or specialized programs. They supervise lieutenants, develop and implement operational procedures, and ensure compliance with institutional policies and regulations. Captains play a major role in strategic planning, staff management, and responding to high-level security concerns, often acting as the command authority during significant incidents.

The Deputy Warden assists in the overall administration of the correctional facility, working closely with the warden to manage both operations and support services. Responsibilities include overseeing staffing, budgeting, inmate programs, training, and policy implementation. The deputy warden ensures coordination between departments, monitors compliance with legal and regulatory standards, and may act on behalf of the warden in their absence.

The Warden is the chief executive officer of the correctional facility and holds ultimate responsibility for its operation. This includes setting policies, managing budgets, overseeing staff and inmate welfare, ensuring security, and maintaining compliance with laws and regulations. The warden provides leadership and direction for the entire institution, represents the facility to external agencies, and is accountable for maintaining a safe, secure, and orderly environment.⁴

---

³Westmaas, L. (2022)

⁴Cartwright, G. (2026) (2026)