Skip to main content
Workforce LibreTexts

12.1: Introduction

  • Page ID
    44640
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Sprinkler devices were invented at the end of the nineteenth century with over seventeen patents issued before 1890 (Morgan, 1993). Since then, sprinkler irrigation has become widespread. It is used around the world on many types of crops and soils. Water is delivered through pipes under pressure directly to the application location, thereby minimizing field conveyance losses while supplying crops on undulating terrain and/or highly permeable soils. Sprinkler systems can be efficient when properly designed and managed. Success depends on understanding characteristics and capabilities while operating within resource and management limitations. What questions should be asked to determine operator goals and restrictions? How should the irrigation system be configured to efficiently meet crop needs while satisfying constraints? What management plan would be most effective? How should you monitor the system to evaluate performance? Concepts presented in this chapter will allow you to address these issues.

    The USDA-NASS (2018) lists the seven types of sprinkler irrigation systems shown in Table 12.1. Survey results show that center-pivot irrigation systems represent approximately 85% of the sprinkler irrigated land in the U.S. in 2017. Linear-move irrigation systems are mechanized systems with characteristics much like center pivots, yet only represent approximately 1% of the irrigated land. The remaining five types of irrigation systems constitute approximately 14% of the sprinkler irrigated land in the United States. While that area is much smaller than for center pivots, it still is significant. The USDA-NASS database includes the number of farms that employed the types of systems. The acres irrigated per farm for center pivots is much larger than other types of sprinkler irrigation. The extent of periodically moved systems for the ten states with the most area is listed in Table 12.2. Most of the area for side-roll and hand-move systems is in the states in or west of the Rocky Mountains. Solid-set systems are used in some states east of the Rocky Mountains, yet California, Washington and Oregon dominate. Big gun systems are more uniformly distributed across the country.

    Table 12.1. Data on sprinkler irrigation from USDA (2019).
    Type of Sprinkler System Number of Farms Total Area (acres) Acres per Farm Percent of Sprinkler Area
    Center Pivot 49,923 26,800,613 537 85%
    Side Roll 16,130 1,788,443 109 6%
    Solid Set 18,216 1,206,860 66 4%
    Traveler 7,518 596,059 79 2%
    Linear Move 3,669 469,408 122 1%
    Other 8,673 401,318 46 1%
    Hand Move 22,266 394,194 17 1%
    Total 126,395 31,656,895 100%

    These data represent irrigation development in the United States. Periodically moved systems are significant internationally, especially in areas with small landholdings or developing areas that lack financial resources needed for drip or mechanized systems. The characteristics and management practices for systems except center pivots and linear-move systems are examined in this chapter. Center pivots and linear-move systems are considered in Chapter 13. Detailed design of moved-lateral, solid-set and gun-based systems involves matching all components and ensuring that hydraulic principles are satisfied—see Keller and Bliesner (1990) and/or Stetson and Mecham (2011) for design procedures. Most management situations depend on systems already in place, so design considerations are only discussed to help evaluate alternatives when system changes are needed or when monitoring system performance.

    Table 12.2. Rank of top ten states for each type of periodically moved system (data from USDA, 2019).
    Rank

    Side Roll

    State

    Side Roll

    Acres

    Hand Move

    State

    Hand Move

    Acres

    Solid Set

    State

    Solid Set

    Acres

    Big Gun

    State

    Big Gun

    State

    1 Idaho 406,429 Oregon 115,405 California 454,924 Oregon 112,182
    2 Utah 258,816 Idaho 73,733 Washington 253,939 Michigan 61,636
    3 Montana 198,603 California 50,262 Oregon 88,463 Washington 48,632
    4 Oregon 196,155 Washington 44,429 Arizona 58,051 Georgia 43,631
    5 Texas 86,163 Montana 33,825 Idaho 46,463 Texas 36,217
    6 California 83,396 Utah 13,745 Florida 42,564 Florida 31,256
    7 Washington 82,373 Colorado 6,973 Texas 38,368 Missouri 24,766
    8 Colorado 79,972 Texas 6,714 Wisconsin 34,903 California 24,433
    9 Illinois 42,338 Wyoming 6,548 Georgia 29,471 New Jersey 22,336
    10 Wyoming 36,645 New Jersey 5,106 Michigan 18,995 N. Carolina 21,305

    12.1: Introduction is shared under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.