Skip to main content
Workforce LibreTexts

4.2: Structuring Your Early Childhood Program

  • Page ID
    44019
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Early childhood programs can be organized in a variety of ways depending on their goals, funding sources, size, and leadership structure. These organizational structures influence how decisions are made, how responsibilities are shared, and how programs grow over time. Some programs are independently owned, while others operate within larger systems or organizations.

    In this chapter, we will focus on four common structures used in early childhood programs: sole proprietorships, partnerships, franchise programs, and corporations. Each structure offers different levels of control, responsibility, and support.

    Understanding these structures is essential for directors and administrators because the foundation of a program’s organization directly impacts leadership, accountability, and long-term success.

    Sole Proprietorship – Single Owner Structure

    A sole proprietorship is one of the most common and straightforward ways to structure an early childhood program. In this model, one individual serves as the main owner and sole proprietor of the business. This person makes all major decisions related to the program, including finances, staffing, policies, and curriculum. Because there is no separation between the owner and the business, the owner also bears full responsibility for all outcomes, both positive and negative.

    One of the benefits of a sole proprietorship is that it is relatively easy to establish. Typically, it requires minimal paperwork compared to more complex business structures, making it an accessible option for individuals entering the field. These programs are often smaller in nature when they begin, but they can grow over time depending on demand and resources. In some cases, owners may need to secure loans or additional funding to expand their program, hire staff, or improve facilities.

    However, this structure can also feel isolating. Because one person is responsible for everything, it can become overwhelming and, at times, lonely without additional leadership support. The owner must manage multiple roles, often balancing administrative responsibilities with direct work in the program. Strong organizational and leadership skills are essential for maintaining quality and sustainability.

    A common example of a sole proprietorship in early childhood education is an in-home child care program. These programs are typically operated out of a provider’s home and may serve a smaller group of children. While many in-home programs are licensed and follow state regulations, some operate without proper licensing. Unlicensed programs may not be held to the same standards for safety, staffing, and quality, which can lead to concerns for children and families.

    Every state has specific licensing guidelines for in-home child care providers. These regulations are designed to ensure safe environments, appropriate supervision, and quality care for children. It is always recommended that families choose licensed programs, as they are monitored and held accountable to regulatory standards. Licensing helps ensure that programs meet health, safety, and educational requirements, supporting better outcomes for children.

    Partnerships – Shared Leadership Models

    A partnership structure involves two or more individuals who share ownership of an early childhood program. Unlike a sole proprietorship, where one person carries all responsibility, partnerships allow for shared decision-making and shared accountability. Each partner contributes to the program in different ways, often based on their individual strengths, experiences, and areas of expertise.

    One of the key advantages of a partnership is the ability to pool resources. Having multiple owners can provide additional capital, making it easier to start, maintain, or grow a program. This can lead to a more stable business structure, especially when unexpected challenges arise. Financial responsibilities, workload, and leadership duties are shared, which can reduce stress on any one individual and create a more balanced approach to program management.

    Partnerships also benefit from collaboration. With more than one leader, there are opportunities for discussion, problem-solving, and diverse perspectives in decision-making. This can lead to stronger, more thoughtful choices that support both the program and the families it serves. However, shared decision-making also means that partners must communicate clearly and work through disagreements in a professional and respectful manner.

    At the same time, partnerships are more complex than sole proprietorships. Because multiple individuals are involved, it is essential to clearly define roles, responsibilities, and expectations from the beginning. This often requires the support of a lawyer to ensure that all agreements are legally sound. Partnership agreements should outline decision-making processes, financial contributions, profit sharing, and procedures for resolving conflicts.

    Proper paperwork and legal documentation are critical in a partnership. Without clear and carefully prepared agreements, misunderstandings can occur and potentially lead to serious legal or financial issues. Taking the time to establish a strong legal foundation helps protect all partners and supports the long-term success of the program.

    Franchise Programs – Operating Within a Larger System

    Franchise programs operate under an established company or organization, where the original owners of the franchise sell the rights to use their name, logo, and overall program model to individual buyers. In early childhood education, this means that a person can open a program using a well-known brand, rather than creating a program entirely on their own. The franchise owner benefits from the reputation and recognition that the company has already built within the community.

    When purchasing a franchise, the buyer typically agrees to follow the company’s established systems and expectations. This often includes using specific supplies, materials, and equipment approved by the company. In many cases, these items must be purchased directly through the franchising organization, ensuring consistency across all locations. While this can simplify decision-making, it also limits flexibility in choosing resources independently.

    One of the major advantages of a franchise model is consistency. Families can expect programs with the same name to offer similar experiences, environments, and expectations. This includes following consistent policies, procedures, and standards set by the company. For families, this can create a sense of trust and predictability, especially if they are already familiar with the brand.

    Franchise programs also provide structured support. Owners often receive training, guidance, and ongoing assistance from the parent company. This can be especially helpful for individuals who are new to program administration. The established framework can make it easier to implement systems for curriculum, operations, and family engagement.

    However, this structure also means less independence. Franchise owners must follow company rules and may have limited ability to make changes based on personal preferences or local needs. There are also financial obligations, such as franchise fees and required purchases. While franchises offer stability and support, they require a commitment to operating within a larger system rather than full autonomy.

    Corporations – Structured and Scalable Organizations

    A corporation is a more complex organizational structure in which the business is owned by one or more shareholders. These shareholders invest money into the program, helping provide the financial foundation needed to operate and grow. Corporations must follow both federal and state laws, and they operate as a separate legal entity from the individuals involved. This separation provides structure, accountability, and legal protection.

    One of the defining features of a corporation is its formal governance system. Corporations operate under established bylaws, which outline how the organization is run, including decision-making processes, roles, and responsibilities. Many corporations also have a board of trustees (or board of directors) that provides oversight and guidance. This structure ensures that decisions are made thoughtfully and align with the organization’s mission and long-term goals.

    Corporate early childhood programs are often larger in scale. Some grow into major organizations with multiple sites, sometimes operating at local, state, or even national levels. These programs may be part of larger groups or systems that provide services across different communities. Because of their size and structure, corporations often have more resources available, including funding, staffing, and access to materials.

    One advantage of corporate structures is their ability to respond to community needs. With established systems and resources, changes may be easier to implement when there is a demand for new or expanded services. For example, many school districts and larger organizations are now offering preschool or transitional kindergarten (TK) programs on-site to meet the needs of families. At the same time, there continues to be a strong need for infant and toddler care, which corporations may also be positioned to address.

    However, starting and managing a corporation is more expensive and complicated than other structures. There are legal requirements, detailed documentation, and ongoing compliance responsibilities that must be followed. Establishing this type of program requires careful planning, financial investment, and strong leadership.

    Despite these challenges, there are several advantages to a corporate structure:

    • Limited liability, protecting personal assets of shareholders
    • Greater access to funding through investors or stakeholders
    • Ability to grow and expand into multiple sites
    • Structured leadership and decision-making systems
    • Increased stability and long-term sustainability
    • Capacity to respond to larger community needs

    For-Profit and Nonprofit Corporations in Early Childhood Programs

    When establishing a corporation, one of the most important decisions is whether the program will operate as a for-profit or a nonprofit organization. This decision affects how the program is funded, how money is used, and how the organization is governed.

    A for-profit corporation is designed to generate profit for its owners or shareholders. In early childhood programs, this means that after covering expenses such as staffing, materials, and operations, remaining revenue can be distributed to owners or reinvested into the business. For-profit programs rely primarily on tuition, fees, and sometimes private investments. These programs must follow federal and state tax laws and report income accordingly. The administrator in a for-profit program often focuses heavily on financial sustainability, enrollment, and business growth.

    A nonprofit corporation on the other hand, is organized to serve a public or community benefit rather than generate profit. These programs reinvest all revenue back into the program to support operations, improve quality, and expand services. Nonprofit organizations can apply for tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Service 501(c)(3) designation, which allows them to be exempt from certain federal taxes. Because of this status, nonprofits can receive donor contributions, apply for grants, and access funding sources that are not available to for-profit programs.

    For administrators, this distinction has a significant impact on daily operations and long-term planning. Nonprofit leaders often spend time securing grants, building community partnerships, and maintaining compliance with tax-exempt regulations. They must also ensure transparency and accountability in how funds are used. In contrast, administrators in for-profit programs focus more on business operations, revenue generation, and maintaining profitability.

    There are important differences to consider when choosing between these two structures. For-profit programs offer greater flexibility in how profits are used and may allow for quicker decision-making. Nonprofit programs, however, have access to additional funding sources such as grants and donations, which can support program expansion and services for underserved communities. Nonprofits are also often viewed as more mission-driven, which can build trust within the community.

    Choosing between a for-profit and nonprofit structure depends on your goals, values, and vision for the program. If your goal is to build a business with financial return, a for-profit model may be appropriate. If your goal is to serve the community and reinvest all resources into program quality and access, a nonprofit model may be a better fit.

    Because this decision has long-term legal and financial implications, it is strongly recommended to consult with an attorney or tax advisor before making a final decision. These professionals can help ensure that the structure you choose aligns with your goals and complies with all legal and tax requirements.


    This page titled 4.2: Structuring Your Early Childhood Program is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jennifer Marta and Hannah Knott.