Skip to main content

Registration is now open for this year's LibreFest! Join us virtually the week of July 13.

Register here
Workforce LibreTexts

11.3: Aligning Curriculum with Program Philosophy, Standards, and Goals

  • Page ID
    60889
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    High-quality curriculum should be connected to the program’s larger purpose. It should reflect what the program believes about children, how children learn, what families and communities value, and what developmental outcomes the program is working toward. Curriculum decisions should not be made only because a set of materials is popular, convenient, or visually appealing. They should be grounded in the program’s philosophy, aligned with relevant standards, and connected to meaningful goals for children’s learning and development.

    Alignment does not mean that every classroom must look identical or that teachers should follow a script. Rather, alignment means that the program’s curriculum, daily practices, learning environment, assessment systems, and teacher interactions all point in the same general direction. When curriculum is aligned, families, teachers, and administrators have a clearer understanding of what the program is trying to accomplish.

    Aligning Curriculum with Program Philosophy

    A program’s philosophy describes its core beliefs about children, families, teaching, and learning. For example, a program may emphasize play-based learning, child-led exploration, school readiness, cultural responsiveness, outdoor learning, faith-based values, dual language development, or inclusion. Whatever the philosophy, the curriculum should reflect those commitments in daily practice.

    If a program says it values child-centered learning but uses mostly worksheets and teacher-directed activities, there is a mismatch between philosophy and curriculum. If a program says it values family engagement but rarely includes family knowledge, culture, or home language in classroom experiences, the curriculum is not fully aligned with the program’s stated values.

    Administrators should regularly ask whether the curriculum reflects what the program says it believes. This includes looking at classroom materials, schedules, planning forms, teaching strategies, documentation, and children’s actual experiences.

    Aligning Curriculum with Standards and Foundations

    Early childhood programs often use standards or developmental foundations to guide curriculum planning. These may include state early learning standards, California Preschool/Transitional Kindergarten Learning Foundations, Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework, NAEYC standards, or other program-specific expectations. Standards help identify important areas of development and learning, such as language, social-emotional development, cognition, physical development, literacy, mathematics, science, and the arts. However, standards should guide curriculum rather than replace it. A standard may identify what children are working toward, but it does not by itself tell teachers how to create meaningful learning experiences. Teachers still need to plan experiences that are developmentally appropriate, engaging, culturally responsive, and connected to children’s interests and needs.

    When used well, standards help teachers notice whether curriculum is balanced across developmental domains. They can also help administrators evaluate whether classrooms are providing sufficient opportunities for children to build important skills over time.

    Caution: Standards are a guide, not the whole curriculum

    Standards and foundations are useful tools, but they should not reduce curriculum to a checklist. Young children do not learn best through isolated skill practice disconnected from meaningful activity. A teacher may be able to identify a math or literacy standard addressed by an activity, but the quality of the experience still depends on how children are engaged, how the teacher supports learning, and whether the activity is appropriate for the children in the group.

    For example, a counting objective could be addressed through a worksheet, but it could also be addressed through counting snack items, building towers, voting on a class question, sorting natural materials outdoors, or comparing how many children are present that day. The standard may be the same, but the learning experience is very different.

    Administrators should help teachers use standards as planning and reflection tools, not as pressure to make early childhood classrooms look like elementary classrooms

    Aligning Curriculum with Program Goals

    In addition to philosophy and standards, curriculum should align with specific program goals. These goals may relate to school readiness, social-emotional development, language development, family engagement, inclusion, cultural responsiveness, or continuity across age groups. Clear goals help programs make intentional curriculum decisions. For example, if a program goal is to strengthen children’s oral language development, curriculum planning should include rich conversation, storytelling, songs, read-alouds, dramatic play, peer interaction, and adult modeling throughout the day. If a program goal is to support self-regulation, the curriculum should include predictable routines, emotional vocabulary, opportunities for problem-solving, and supportive adult guidance. Program goals should be broad enough to support the whole child, but specific enough to guide planning and evaluation. Without clear goals, curriculum decisions can become scattered or inconsistent.

    Maintaining Coherence Across Classrooms

    In multi-classroom programs, alignment also means that children and families experience a coherent program, even when individual teachers have different styles. Classrooms do not need to be identical, but they should reflect shared expectations about child development, routines, interactions, curriculum planning, and family communication. Administrators can support coherence by using common planning tools, shared curriculum frameworks, staff meetings, classroom observations, and professional development. These systems help ensure that the program’s curriculum philosophy is not dependent on one teacher’s personal preferences alone. At the same time, coherence should not eliminate teacher judgment. Teachers need room to respond to the children in front of them. The goal is a shared foundation with appropriate flexibility.


    This page titled 11.3: Aligning Curriculum with Program Philosophy, Standards, and Goals is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Jennifer Marta and Hannah Knott.