14.2: Understanding Professional Growth as an Administrative Responsibility
- Page ID
- 62003
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)Professional growth is not only the responsibility of individual staff members. Early childhood administrators play a major role in creating the conditions that allow staff to keep learning, improving, and building confidence in their work. A program cannot expect consistently high-quality practice if staff are hired, given a handbook, sent to occasional trainings, and then left on their own. Research on the early childhood workforce emphasizes that young children benefit from adults who understand child development, use effective practices, and respond to children’s individual needs. Because early childhood work is complex, staff need ongoing professional learning that is connected to their actual roles and classroom experiences. Professional development is strongest when it is part of a system, not a one-time event.
Professional Growth and Program Quality
The quality of an early childhood program depends heavily on what staff know and do each day. Curriculum, safety policies, assessment systems, and family engagement plans all depend on staff who can apply them well. A strong written policy or curriculum framework will have little effect if staff do not understand how to put it into practice.
Professional growth supports program quality by helping staff strengthen their knowledge, refine their skills, and respond to new challenges. This may include improving teacher-child interactions, using observation more effectively, supporting children with disabilities, communicating with families, or managing transitions more smoothly. For administrators, professional development is therefore not an optional benefit. It is part of quality assurance.
Beyond One-Time Training
Many programs rely heavily on workshops or required training hours. These can be useful, especially when staff need information about policies, safety procedures, or new requirements. However, one-time training is often not enough to change daily practice. Staff may understand an idea during a workshop but struggle to apply it consistently in the classroom. Professional learning is more likely to influence practice when staff have opportunities to try strategies, receive feedback, reflect, and continue improving over time. This is why coaching, mentoring, peer collaboration, and follow-up support are important. They help move professional development from “information received” to “practice improved.”
A staff member can complete many training hours without significantly changing practice. Professional growth is better measured by whether staff develop stronger skills, make better decisions, and apply effective practices with children, families, and colleagues.
The Administrator’s Role in Professional Learning
Administrators shape professional growth in several ways. They decide what training is prioritized, whether staff have time to participate, how new learning is followed up, and whether improvement is supported through coaching or feedback. They also influence whether staff experience professional learning as meaningful or as a compliance task.
A strong administrator asks practical questions:
- What do staff already do well?
- What practices need improvement?
- What support will help staff apply new learning?
- How will we know whether professional development changed practice?
These questions shift professional development away from random training selection and toward intentional program improvement.
Professional Growth and Staff Retention
Professional growth also affects staff morale and retention. Staff are more likely to remain in a program when they feel supported, respected, and able to improve. Opportunities for learning, mentoring, advancement, and leadership can help staff see early childhood education as a career rather than a temporary job. This does not mean professional development solves all workforce problems. Low wages, high stress, and limited staffing remain significant barriers in the field. Still, professional growth systems can reduce isolation and help staff feel more competent and valued. When staff are given no meaningful support, they may become frustrated or stagnant. When they are supported well, they are more likely to build confidence and contribute to a stronger program.
Professional Development as Continuous Improvement
Professional growth should be connected to continuous improvement. This means administrators use observation, staff feedback, child data, family input, and program goals to decide what learning is needed. Professional development should not be selected only because a training is available or because hours are required.
For example, if classroom observations show that transitions are stressful across several rooms, the program may focus professional learning on routines, visual supports, and teacher-child interactions. If staff report uncertainty about supporting dual language learners, the program may provide targeted training and coaching in language-rich practices. The topic should match the need. A continuous improvement approach helps professional development feel relevant. Staff can see the connection between what they are learning and the real challenges they face.
Creating the Conditions for Growth
Staff need time, support, and psychological safety in order to grow. If professional development is presented as criticism, staff may become defensive. If they are expected to change practice without planning time or feedback, they may become discouraged. Programs can support growth by providing regular feedback, opportunities for collaboration, access to coaching, and time to reflect. Leaders can also model learning by acknowledging that improvement is part of professional work for everyone, not a sign of failure. Growth-oriented programs do not expect staff to be perfect. They expect staff to keep learning, reflect on practice, and use support to improve.


