3: Sentencing
- Page ID
- 70565
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\dlim}{\displaystyle\lim\limits} \)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)
\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)
\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)
\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)
\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)
\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)
\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)
\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow\)
\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)
\(\newcommand{\longvect}{\overrightarrow}\)
\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)
\(\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left| #1 \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left< #1 \right|}\)
\(\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2} \right| \left. #2 \vphantom{#1} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\left< #1 \vphantom{#2}\vphantom{#3} \right| #2 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#3} \left| #3 \vphantom{#1}\vphantom{#2} \right>}\)
\(\newcommand{\qmvec}[1]{\mathbf{\vec{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\op}[1]{\hat{\mathbf{#1}}}\)
\(\newcommand{\expect}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\)
\(\newcommand{\dfn}[1]{\emph{\textbf{#1}}}\)
In Chapter 1, I discussed the purpose and principles of corrections. The purpose is punishment and the principles, which included deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restoration or restorative justice. Each one of these principles is a concept of how punishment is to be carried out but, it is not the process. Case in point, if a judge sentences a person to prison, that sentence follows the principle of incapacitation. Now when that person gets to prison, the type of incapacitation they will have to endure will be based on a number of different factors determined by the court, upon arriving to the prison and throughout their commitment to the department of corrections. In this chapter we will discuss some of those factors also known as criminal sanctions. (M. Ybarra 2025)
Criminal sanctions, in law and by legal definition, are penalties or other means of enforcement used to provide incentives for obedience with the law or other rules and regulations. Criminal sanctions can take the form of serious punishment, such as corporal or capital punishment, incarceration, or severe fines. In the United States, the most common forms of criminal sanctions include fees and fines, incarceration, intermediate sanctions, probation and capital punishment. Within the context of civil law, sanctions are usually monetary fines which are levied against a party to a lawsuit or to their attorney for violating rules of procedure, or for abusing the judicial process.8
One of the misconceptions by the public of the sentencing process is that the majority of the people who violate the law are sent to jail and/or prison. And that can't be farther from the truth. Over 50% of felony convictions result in probation or some other type of community based sanction, even if the offender has an extensive criminal history with similarly situated offenses to the new conviction. Part of this is out of necessity based on beds pace availability of local jails and prisons and dwindling budgets. Recently, the courts have moved to the idea of sentencing a person to jail or prison for even serious and/or violent felonies as an option of last resort. State prisons and local jails sentences account for just short of 35% of all criminal sanctions. (M. Ybarra 2025)
Despite the reduced reliance of incarceration in the United States, it is one of the primary means of punishment for crime. In 2021, over five million people were under supervision by the criminal justice system, with nearly two million people incarcerated in state or federal prisons and local jails. While this might sound like a huge amount of people, and it is in comparison to the population of the United States which stands at 340.1 million as of 2024, this amount to .589 % of the population.9
While the courts do have some latitude as to the type and length of sentence to impose on a person convicted of a crime, criminal code enacted by the legislature dictates the type of sentences and length of commitment that may be imposed for a crime. Further, the legislature through legislative writ determines the sentence structure the court is obligated to follow. The three primary sentence structures used in the United States are indeterminate sentences, determinate sentences and mandatory minimum sentences. (M Ybarra 2025)
- 3.1: Indeterminate Sentencing
- This page examines the evolution of U.S. sentencing, detailing the shift from indeterminate to determinate sentencing. Indeterminate sentences allowed discretion for parole, focusing on rehabilitation but faced criticism for potential misuse. Determinate sentencing, providing fixed sentences with reduced judicial discretion, arose from dissatisfaction with the former approach.
- 3.2: Incarceration
- This page discusses the high incarceration rate in the U.S., highlighting drug offenses at 20% and violent crimes at 62% of state prisons. It notes a 2.3% annual decline in incarceration rates since 2009 and describes intermediate sanctions like probation and electronic monitoring as alternatives to imprisonment. Additionally, it briefly covers probation's historical roots and defines capital punishment as the execution for severe crimes.
- 3.3: Terms and Critical Thinking Questions
- This page covers criminal sanctions and sentencing, detailing indeterminate and determinate sentencing, guidelines, and mandatory minimums. It explores alternatives like intermediate sanctions, shock incarceration, and suspended sentences, alongside historical insights on probation. Critical thinking questions prompt readers to evaluate the fairness and effectiveness of these practices and to suggest alternatives for fines and sentencing systems.
8Wikipedia, 2020
9Wikipedia, 2019


